Skip to content
Home » BLOG » General » California Non-Compete Law: Is Your Business Exposed to Employee Lawsuits?

California Non-Compete Law: Is Your Business Exposed to Employee Lawsuits?

California’s complete ban on employee non-compete agreements has turned into a major legal trap for business owners. Under state laws SB 699 and AB 1076, businesses can now be sued directly by employees just for having non-compete language in their old contracts, employee handbooks, or hiring paperwork. It does not matter if you never actually tried to enforce the non-compete; simply keeping it on the books exposes your company to major financial penalties and expensive lawsuits.
Many business owners mistakenly assume that if their employment contracts contain a standard severability clause, they are automatically protected. This is no longer true under the current statutory rules. The simple existence of the restrictive text serves as a basis for legal action. If an employee discovers that your historical paperwork restricts their ability to find a new job, they can immediately seek legal representation to file a civil claim against your firm. This statutory trap allows plaintiff attorneys to use your own legacy onboarding documentation as an absolute weapon to extract financial settlements from your business operations.
Employment Defense Notice: Has a current or former employee threatened legal action over an old employment contract? Avoid severe statutory damages and fee-shifting risks. Contact Law Advocate Group, LLP for an immediate compliance assessment.

Defending Out-of-State Contracts When Employees Move to California

The biggest risk happens when out-of-state companies hire people who move to or work from California. State law explicitly reaches across state lines. The law says that any non-compete is completely void in California, no matter where or when the contract was signed. This creates a severe jurisdictional blindspot for national companies who assume their out-of-state choice-of-law provisions will protect their business structures. If an employee signs a valid restrictive covenant in New York or Texas and later relocates to a remote home office within California boundaries, your out-of-state contract becomes an instant statutory violation under California jurisdiction.
Defending your business against an employee lawsuit requires looking closely at where the work actually happens. Our defense strategies focus on challenging these lawsuits when the core of the job belongs in another state, helping out-of-state businesses avoid California’s aggressive legal penalties while keeping business contract disputes completely under control. We focus on showing that the employee’s operational footprint remains outside California’s border to dismantle the legal foundations of their statutory civil claim. If the employee’s local nexus can be structurally disproven, we can effectively block California’s overreaching labor statutes from destroying your proprietary business protections.

Legal Analysis of Employer Liability Frameworks

Can an employer be sued for having a non compete in California?

Yes. Current employees, former employees, and even people applying for a job can sue you if you ask them to sign or try to enforce a non-compete. They can ask the court to stop you and demand payment for damages. These legal disputes are often filed directly in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, forcing out-of-state entities to mount an active, localized trial defense. Furthermore, because the statute extends private rights of action to job applicants, a company can be sued simply because an unhired candidate objects to an outdated clause inside a standard, pre-printed application form.

What are the statutory damages under Ab 1076 for employers?

AB 1076 treats putting a non-compete clause in a contract as an unfair business practice. This means if an employee sues you and wins, the court can force your business to pay civil penalties, financial restitution, and all of the employee’s legal and attorney fees. This mandatory fee-shifting provision turns minor contract disputes into high-stakes financial liabilities that can severely drain corporate capital. Under this framework, a plaintiff attorney can file a lawsuit over a completely dormant non-compete clause, knowing that if they win even a single dollar in damages, your business is legally forced to foot their entire six-figure legal bill.

How does Sb 699 impact out of state employment contracts?

SB 699 makes any non-compete completely illegal to enforce in California. It does not matter if the contract was legally signed in another state like New York or Texas, or if the worker was not a California resident when they signed it. The minute an employee establishes residency or carries out regular remote operations inside California, the historical restrictive covenant becomes void under state law. The statute strips away any defense based on out-of-state contractual supremacy, meaning national corporate governance structures must be immediately audited and re-drafted whenever an executive or technical worker crosses into California’s employment footprint.

Do California employers have to notify employees about void non competes?

Yes. State law required all California employers to send individualized, written notices to any current or former employee hired after January 1, 2022, explicitly telling them that their non-competes are void. Failing to send this notice is a direct violation of the law. Employers who ignored this mandatory notification window face immediate exposure to employee-led unfair competition lawsuits under Business and Professions Code Section 17200. This omission provides plaintiff’s counsel with an undisputed data trail to establish statutory non-compliance, leaving the corporate entity with virtually no defense baseline at trial.
Skip to content